Sig.

[Saboter]

Transparency FTW.

http://rpwd.com/saboter/sigs/SaboterLTD2.png

[post-mortem]

nice

[Anonym]

Only for non-Internet Explorer users.

[FireWall]

Only for non-Internet Explorer users.

Yep.

[Saboter]

Well, if your still using IE, you got issues.

[tice]

If you don't know the difference between your and you're you have issues.

[eyez]

Well, if your still using IE, you got issues.

never liked Firefox. =\

If you don't know the difference between your and you're you have issues.

lol...it gets annoying when people still get riled up over grammar mistakes on the internet

[tice]

Yeah I'm so riled up I could fuck a fat chick.

Shut your mouth slanty.

<3

[deLeet]

:d

[senor-turkey-lurkey]

grammar rodeo!

[VeeKaChu]

Well, if your still using IE, you got issues.My only issue is I see a bunch of colorful blobs in an ugly grey rectangle. Off-center, too.

It's not my problem that your sig is ugly in my browser. Hell, it might even look cool without the awful border, but I'll never know...

[Hard`]

Because the browser you're using defines you as a person.

[Anonym]

Because the browser you're using defines you as a person.
Well, actually, in a way it can.

[Noremorse]

Well, actually, in a way it can.

except no...

bad sig.

[Anonym]

"Except no" what? I don't understand. Perhaps it's just anecdotal, but I've found that the majority of Firefox users are more Internet literate and in touch with current technology over those who continue to use Internet Explorer. Hence, using Firefox can tell me, at least, that the user will probably be able to grasp more advanced Internet-related subjects and new technology over an Internet Explorer user.

If there's one thing that's important about surfing the Web, it's security: and if someone isn't worried enough about security to switch to a more secure browser, it makes me wonder just how much that person knows about the Web. Granted, there are exceptions, and many users who were around at the start of the computer age still use Internet Explorer, despite the obvious problems: whether this is due to stubborness, laziness, or pure ignorance isn't known to me. Regardless, those people still exist, and they will continue to perplex me.

Therefore, for the most part, I can tell a person's Internet-related experience with computers - hence, the kind of person they are; whether it be an e-mail user only or a power user - by their browser choice. I can't tell whether they're arrogant or meek, artistic or analytical, but I can at least tell how involved they are with computers. Perhaps I should have given the scope of my contradiction beforehand.

[Noremorse]

guess i didn't understand you at first then :p

[tice]

David stop typing essays you crazy crock.

[b-buddy]

yeah david

[Thrash]

yea davids.


It seems for some reason it is always girl friends who's dads refuse to let them get Mozilla, or AIM citing "they put viruses on the computer" :rolleyes: These are always people who know how to build computers but are stupid fucks otherwise.

My ex's stepdad could build a computer from scratch up in about an hour, but he wouldn't let her use Mozilla, or get AIM because "they cause computer viruses" BUT he would install Kazaa Lite K++ because that's okay. And whenever I told my girlfriend it wasn't AIM or Mozilla but things they download from Kazaa causing viruses she would say "no it's the clean Kazaa it doesn't have a virus. I only download songs" :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

[tice]

Note: Thrash takes it in the ass.

[FireWall]

Note: Thrash takes it in the ass.

lol

[schwaBAM]

Weird..

How come when I make a .gif sig and view it in IE and Firefox I see no background. Yet with yours it had a hideous grey background in IE?

[Eternal]

His sig is a .png. In Firefox .png's dont show up with the grey background. So when he looks at it there is no grey background opposed to IE users who see the grey background.

[Anonym]

PNG alpha transparency isn't supported natively in Internet Explorer. Yes, I know: it's shocking to hear that a Microsoft Internet-related product is outdated. But it's true.

[snaggle]

PNG alpha transparency isn't supported natively in Internet Explorer. Yes, I know: it's shocking to hear that a Microsoft Internet-related product is outdated. But it's true.
BLASPHEMER!

[Anonym]

SARCASMER too!

[schwaBAM]

Ah.

So whats the advantage of making a sig in .png and not .gif? Size?

[snaggle]

Bragging rights.

[Anonym]

The quality of the image is far greater in PNG than in GIF, as is the transparency.